Benchmarks
Against the names that matter
Share of voice and diffusion versus the competitors and outlets you name. Same window, same corpus, same dates.
Named peers
Competitors in the workspace, or they are absent.
Competitive radar
Piqline versus Cision and Meltwater on desk-critical axes.
7d · vs previous 7 days · as of 27 Aug, 07:42
Benchmark
Piqline
Peers
2
Named, not generic
You set the set: brands, titles, agencies, public bodies. We do not invent a market panel. Comparisons are only as good as the sources in the workspace.
Share of voice and diffusion versus the names you put in. If a competitor is not in the workspace, they are not in the share.
The board question is usually "who had it first, and how long was the lag?" That is the diffusion curve, not a vanity tally.
- Same window, same corpus, same dates as Measure
- You name the set. We do not invent peers
- Empty sources: empty comparison. No filler
Benchmarks is not a second corpus. If the item is not in the feed, the view is empty. That emptiness is the product being honest.
Questions we get
- Is it real time?
- Quasi real time: minutes on priority sources, with cadence, timezone and quiet hours. Not a one-second stream of the whole web.
- Do you cover everything?
- No. Public pages in the workspace or pack. Official sources, company sites, documented providers. Exhaustiveness is not the offer.
- What if the audit finds nothing?
- We do not sell. The dated sample is yours to keep. That is the wedge, not a trial of empty dashboards.
- Who is the client?
- A B2B workspace. Particulars, candidates, buyers and creators are never the client. At most a channel the customer already uses.
See it on your market
The first meeting is a dated audit. If the backtest is empty, we do not sell.
Then sources, cadences, the first monitors. Minutes on priority sources.